Experts: State Wildlife Management In Wyoming, Montana and Idaho Has Lost Its Way

Story in Yellowstonian leads to Chris Servheen and Doug Smith being featured on national podcast in which grizzly and wolf experts offer severe critique of state wildlife management

INSPIRE OTHERS AND SHARE

A grizzly wanders through Hayden Valley in Yellowstone. Photo courtesy Eric Johnston/NPS

by Todd Wilkinson

For years, the three states which converge to form the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem——Wyoming, Montana and Idaho—were praised for being in the vanguard of modern American wildlife management. From reviving decimated populations of elk, moose, bighorn sheep and mountain goats to setting the standard for how to sustain wild, cold-water trout, and recovering imperiled mammals and birds, that triumvirate demonstrated how science-based conservation was supposed to work.

But today, Drs. Christopher Servheen and Douglas Smith say what used to be management driven by professional biologists and data has been usurped by politicians, many of whom either don’t understand science or willfully ignore it. Servheen spent 35 years overseeing the US Fish and Wildlife Service’s national grizzly bear recovery efforts in the Northern Rockies, and Smith just joined Servheen in retirement after leading wolf management in Yellowstone National Park for decades.

Not long ago, they wrote an exclusive critique for Yellowstonian about why they believe those states cannot be trusted to assume management of grizzlies if bears ever are removed from federal protection under the Endangered Species Act and then hunted to reduce their numbers. They point to anti-carnivore attitudes aimed at wolves as evidence of how ethical, fact-based management has been replaced by what they call “backward attitudes” better suited to the 19th century.

Indeed, morale in many of those agencies is in a downward spiral and veteran biologists are leaving the ranks because, they say, heavy-handed political agendas being applied by governors and legislators have destroyed their once-proud tradition of stewardship backed by science.

The piece by Servheen and Smith published in Yellowstonian struck a chord. Titled “Will Two Of The World’s Greatest Wildlife Conservation Success Stories Be Unwritten?”, it gained widespread circulation and generated hundreds of thousands of reads, shares and comments on social media.

Now, as a follow up, Servheen and Smith were recently featured on The Wolf Connection podcast hosted by John Calfa, who also steered listeners to the essay in Yellowstonian. The conversation with Calfa, The Future of Wolves & Grizzly Bears, is both enlightening and hard-hitting. Click on the link below when you have time to give it a full listen. Best when on a roadtrip or relaxing over your favorite morning or evening beverage.

The Wolf Connection
Episode #182 Doug Smith & Chris Servheen – The Future of Wolves & Grizzly Bears

Author

  • (Author)

    Todd Wilkinson, co-founder of Yellowstonian, has been an award-winning American journalist for almost 40 years, known foremost for his writing about the environment and his knowledge of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. In addition to his books on topics ranging from scientific whistleblowers and Ted Turner to Grizzly 399 (that book featuring images by photographer Tom Mangelsen) and coffee table volumes on a number of prominent fine artists, Wilkinson has written for National Geographic, The Guardian, The Washington Post, Christian Science Monitor and many other publications. He started his career as a violent crime reporter with the City News Bureau of Chicago. He is also a writing fellow of the Northern Rockies Conservation Cooperative based in Jackson Hole.

    View all posts

Subscribe
To Our
Newsletter

Featured Stories

On top of national forests and BLM tracts being flooded with more cattle, Greater Yellowstone wildlands may see an unprecedented surge in logging. In their column, Servheen and Wilkinson discuss impacts on grizzlies and conservation
James Huffman, a former law professor, scrutinizes the controversial decision by BLM to cancel the organization's grazing allotments because it wanted to run bison, not cattle, in service to conservation
What's happening now in the heart of the wide-open West is something of national importance. Its outcome has huge implications for hundreds of millions of acres from the Pacific to the Mississippi

Subscribe
To Our
Newsletter