Co-existence: What Does It Really Mean?

Immersion in nature enhances our physical and mental well-being, but what does our presence do in raising the stress levels of non-humans living there?

INSPIRE OTHERS AND SHARE

A Question for the Moment

Why do we often act so surprised when we encounter animals on a backcountry trail? 

It’s a little like having people we don’t know suddenly barging through our font door into the kitchen where we and family members are peacefully dining—and them, holding cans of bear spray or sidearms in their hands, being surprised by our presence. 

When we’re recreating, we are entering the finite homes of wildlife, which have far fewer options for survival than we do. They’re in the habitat they depend on—by necessity. Our desire to have fun should not supersede their need to be undisturbed.

One more thing to remember: if we have our dogs with us, off leash, the level of disruption and displacement is even worse. Today, many of the federal land management agencies already treat front country areas as sacrifice zones allowing human users to dominate. Increasingly, some backcountry areas are beginning to resemble the busy front country.

When we use the word co-existence, what does it really mean, in terms of benefitting whom at the expense of what?

Subscribe
To Our
Newsletter

Featured Stories

The Endangered Species Act has been a beacon for wildlife conservation in the world, reviving bald eagles, grizzlies, and wolves. Now Wyoming’s Brian Nesvik, head of the US Fish and Wildlife Service, is helping to destroy it. For whom is he an advocate?
Dorothy Bradley, whose father was a defender of wilderness and knew many of the conservation giants, wonders aloud about Ryan Zinke's true intent. Is it to protect wildlands or carve more up?
Mark Fiege, a respected Greater Yellowstone historian, gently pushes back against the cancelling critics of Stegner and the conservation he promoted. He is delivering a lecture on Stegner in Livingston on October 14

Subscribe
To Our
Newsletter