Co-existence: What Does It Really Mean?

Immersion in nature enhances our physical and mental well-being, but what does our presence do in raising the stress levels of non-humans living there?

INSPIRE OTHERS AND SHARE

A Question for the Moment

Why do we often act so surprised when we encounter animals on a backcountry trail? 

It’s a little like having people we don’t know suddenly barging through our font door into the kitchen where we and family members are peacefully dining—and them, holding cans of bear spray or sidearms in their hands, being surprised by our presence. 

When we’re recreating, we are entering the finite homes of wildlife, which have far fewer options for survival than we do. They’re in the habitat they depend on—by necessity. Our desire to have fun should not supersede their need to be undisturbed.

One more thing to remember: if we have our dogs with us, off leash, the level of disruption and displacement is even worse. Today, many of the federal land management agencies already treat front country areas as sacrifice zones allowing human users to dominate. Increasingly, some backcountry areas are beginning to resemble the busy front country.

When we use the word co-existence, what does it really mean, in terms of benefitting whom at the expense of what?

Subscribe
To Our
Newsletter

Featured Stories

Lois Red Elk was told by her father that when red-tails cry, someone is looking for help. The Lakota/Dakota poet writes how in our sentient world we need to be open to nature's messages
Michael Garrity says the Forest Service is illegally shrinking "secure habitat" for grizzlies in the Northern Rockies by authorizing huge deforestation projects. That's why his group and others are challenging the agency in court
Are social media influencers helping to educate the masses or bringing more pressure on wildlife and wild places? A new column, "Conversations from the Green Thicket," enlists Chris Servheen to talk about impacts on The Great Bear

Subscribe
To Our
Newsletter