Co-existence: What Does It Really Mean?

Immersion in nature enhances our physical and mental well-being, but what does our presence do in raising the stress levels of non-humans living there?

INSPIRE OTHERS AND SHARE

A Question for the Moment

Why do we often act so surprised when we encounter animals on a backcountry trail? 

It’s a little like having people we don’t know suddenly barging through our font door into the kitchen where we and family members are peacefully dining—and them, holding cans of bear spray or sidearms in their hands, being surprised by our presence. 

When we’re recreating, we are entering the finite homes of wildlife, which have far fewer options for survival than we do. They’re in the habitat they depend on—by necessity. Our desire to have fun should not supersede their need to be undisturbed.

One more thing to remember: if we have our dogs with us, off leash, the level of disruption and displacement is even worse. Today, many of the federal land management agencies already treat front country areas as sacrifice zones allowing human users to dominate. Increasingly, some backcountry areas are beginning to resemble the busy front country.

When we use the word co-existence, what does it really mean, in terms of benefitting whom at the expense of what?

Author

Support Great Conservation Journalism

Image by Thomas D. Mangelsen/all rights reserved. See more at mangelsen.com

Subscribe
To Our
Newsletter

Featured Stories

Island Park, Idaho is no island when it comes to fire, nor its vulnerability in the forest. Do residents there—and elsewhere—accept that living in Greater Yellowstone demands more ecological awareness and responsibility? Enjoy this excerpt of Paul Rogers' essay appearing in a new book, "A Watershed Moment"
Land Trusts are on the front lines of resisting unwanted landscape changes sweeping across our favorite valleys but they’re underdogs. Help them succeed 
Dr. Christopher Servheen, who guided federal grizzly conservation efforts for 35 years and who wrote recovery plan, says old document is outdated. Bear management, he insists, needs to acknowledge new threats and use best available science

Subscribe
To Our
Newsletter